|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Home > 학회활동 > 국제학술지 |
|
|
|
|
|
작성일 : 17-03-20 13:43
| 저 자 |
|
Sang-Won Kang et al |
| 제 목 |
|
Optimal planning strategy among various arc arrangements for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. |
| 학회지명 |
|
NCBI |
| 권 호 |
|
15;51(1) |
| 페이지 |
|
112-120 |
| 년,월 |
|
2017-1-15 |
| 링 크 |
|
 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265240 [1966] |
| Abstract |
|
BACKGROUND:
The aim of this study was to determine the optimal strategy among various arc arrangements in prostate plans of stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy (SBRT-VMAT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
To investigate how arc arrangements affect dosimetric and biological metrics, SBRT-VMAT plans for eighteen patients were generated with arrangements of single-full arc (1FA), single-partial arc (1PA), double-full arc (2FA), and double-partial arc (2PA). All plans were calculated by the Acuros XB calculation algorithm. Dosimetric and radiobiological metrics for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated from dosevolume histograms.
RESULTS:
All plans were highly conformal (CI<1.05, CN=0.91) and homogeneous (HI=0.09-0.12) for target volumes. For OARs, there was no difference in the bladder dose, while there was a significant difference in the rectum and both femoral head doses. Plans using 1PA and 2PA showed a strong reduction to the mean rectum dose compared to plans using 1FA and 2FA. Contrastively, the D2% and mean dose in both femoral heads were always lower in plans using 1FA and 2FA. The average tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability were comparable in plans using all arc arrangements.
CONCLUSIONS:
The use of 1PA had a more effective delivery time and produced equivalent target coverage with better rectal sparing, although all plans using four arc arrangements showed generally similar for dosimetric and biological metrics. However, the D2% and mean dose in femoral heads increased slightly and remained within the tolerance. Therefore, this study suggests that the use of 1PA is an attractive choice for delivering prostate SBRT-VMAT. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
